Zomi Frankcom and six colleagues died when the Israeli military bombed their clearly marked humanitarian convoy in Gaza. The group had been delivering food to starving Palestinians on a route pre-approved by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF).
The IDF struck the convoy multiple times, despite its vehicles displaying humanitarian insignia and sharing coordinates in advance. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called the incident a “mistake” the following day. Two commanders retired afterward, and three others faced disciplinary measures. Well over two years later, the IDF announced it would not conduct further investigation, classifying the deaths as a tragic error rather than a potential crime.
Israel’s legal justification falls short
The IDF’s decision relies on the claim that no criminal intent existed—only negligence. Under international law, this distinction carries weight. Article 8 of the International Criminal Court statute defines attacks on humanitarian workers as war crimes when carried out with knowledge of civilian harm. Manslaughter laws in Australia and the UK also treat fatal negligence as criminal if it results from reckless or grossly irresponsible conduct. The Israeli government has not apologized for the killings, nor has it provided evidence supporting its conclusion that no crime occurred.
The pattern is not new. During the 2009 “Operation Cast Lead,” over 1,000 Palestinians died, including civilians in attacks on hospitals and mosques. The IDF opened 400 investigations into individual soldiers but secured only two convictions. The sole prison sentence—a seven-month term—was for credit card theft.
Related: France’s Assisted Dying Law Goes Into Effect
Selective investigations reveal inconsistencies
The IDF’s recent decisions highlight uneven enforcement. While it declined to investigate the deaths of Frankcom and other aid workers, including two Médecins Sans Frontières staff, it permitted probes into two other incidents: the deaths of two doctors in a Red Crescent ambulance and an attack on medics that killed 15. The difference lay in the evidence. In those cases, phone footage and survivor testimony contradicted IDF claims that the ambulances lacked proper markings or were moving without lights.
When proof of war crimes becomes undeniable, the IDF sometimes acts—but only partially. Even then, court proceedings are rare. The system appears structured to avoid accountability rather than uphold it.
Families of the victims rarely receive justice. Israeli courts, often seen as sympathetic to the military, impose time limits and immunities that make lawsuits nearly impossible. Frankcom’s family could pursue legal action, but success is unlikely.
Australia, her home country, has few options. It could fund legal efforts in Israel, though obstacles remain. Another path would be pushing the International Criminal Court to investigate. Palestine is a member of the court, and the ICC has already asserted jurisdiction over war crimes in Gaza, including ongoing cases against Netanyahu and his defense minister for alleged starvation tactics and attacks on civilian infrastructure.
Related: Judge Dennis Davis Leaves Lasting Legal Legacy
The U.S., Australia’s closest ally, has opposed the ICC’s work. Last month, the State Department launched a campaign to “disable the court’s ability to operate” by pressuring member nations to withdraw support. Senator Marco Rubio accused the ICC of “maliciously abusing its authority” and authorized sanctions against its chief prosecutor and judges involved in the Netanyahu case.
Australia has historically supported the ICC but faces pressure over its AUKUS defense pact with the U.S. and UK. The government has demanded Israel release evidence behind its decision not to investigate Frankcom’s death, but Israel has refused. Its ambassador claimed a court had already ruled out criminal liability—though no independent or public court reviewed the case.
The incident exposed flaws in the system meant to protect aid workers. When their status is ignored and responses remain evasive, the protections they rely on fail. The IDF’s refusal to investigate sends a message that some lives, even those of humanitarian staff, are considered expendable.
For now, the most meaningful response may come from Frankcom’s home country: a continued push for answers, even when justice seems out of reach.
